Korur

Catch the Failures That Take You Down — Before Production Does

We deliberately break your systems in a controlled way to surface a dozen hidden failure modes before they surface during a 2 a.m. outage.

Your Recovery Plan Has Never Been Tested
Resilience that only exists on paper isn't resilience. The first time you discover a single point of failure shouldn't be at 3 a.m. during a real outage.
?

Untested assumptions fail under load

Failover, retries, and backups all 'should work', until the day they quietly don't.

MTTR

MTTR is a guess, not a number

Without practice, your time-to-recovery is whatever it happens to be on the worst possible day.

Hidden dependencies cascade

One overlooked dependency can turn a small failure into a full outage no one saw coming.

Incidents become learning by disaster

Teams discover their weak points during real customer-facing outages instead of controlled experiments.

Hoping It Works vs. Proving It Works
The difference between assumed resilience and demonstrated resilience.

Untested resilience

  • Failover documented but never exercised
  • MTTR unknown until a real incident
  • Single points of failure discovered too late
  • On-call learns the system during outages
  • Post-mortems repeat the same surprises

Korur chaos engineering

  • Failure modes triggered and proven in controlled tests
  • MTTR measured, tracked, and improved
  • Single points of failure found and fixed proactively
  • On-call rehearses real scenarios safely
  • Each experiment hardens the system measurably
How We Run Chaos Experiments
Controlled, hypothesis-driven failure injection, never reckless breakage.
1

Define steady state

We establish what 'healthy' looks like in measurable terms before touching anything.

Setup
2

Form a hypothesis

We predict how the system should behave when a specific component fails.

3

Inject controlled failure

We trigger the failure in a blast-radius-limited way, with a kill switch ready.

Per experiment
4

Measure & compare

We compare actual behavior against the hypothesis and capture the gaps.

5

Harden & repeat

Findings drive fixes; experiments are automated so resilience keeps improving.

Ongoing
Experiments We Run
A library of failure scenarios mapped to your real architecture.

Instance & node termination

Kill compute on demand to prove auto-healing and failover actually work.

Network latency & partition

Inject delays and splits to surface fragile timeouts and retry storms.

Dependency outages

Take down databases, queues, and third-party APIs to test graceful degradation.

Resource exhaustion

Starve CPU, memory, and disk to validate limits and back-pressure.

Region & zone failure

Simulate losing an availability zone to verify multi-region recovery.

Traffic surges

Drive load spikes to confirm scaling and rate-limiting hold under pressure.

What We Test for Resilience
Coverage across the layers where outages actually originate.

Compute and container orchestration

Databases and data stores

Message queues and event streams

Third-party API dependencies

Load balancers and networking

Auto-scaling and failover logic

Backup and restore procedures

Observability and alerting paths

On-call and incident runbooks

Resilience, Measured
What teams gain after a chaos engineering program.
40%+
Typical MTTR reduction
0
Surprise single points of failure
100%
Recovery paths proven, not assumed
24/7
Confidence in failover
How a Program Rolls Out
We start small and safe, then scale the practice.
  1. 1

    Assess & baseline

    Week 1-2

    Map the architecture, define steady state, and identify candidate experiments.

  2. 2

    First controlled experiments

    Week 3-4

    Run low-blast-radius experiments in staging, then carefully in production.

  3. 3

    Harden & automate

    Month 2

    Fix what breaks and automate recurring experiments into your pipeline.

  4. 4

    Continuous practice

    Ongoing

    Chaos becomes a routine, scheduled discipline owned by your team.

What You Gain
Resilience you can prove, not just promise.

Faster recovery

Lower MTTR because your team has rehearsed real failures.

Fewer surprises

Single points of failure are found in tests, not outages.

Confident on-call

Engineers trust the system because they've watched it recover.

Resilient by design

Hardening becomes a continuous habit, not a one-off project.

What Engineering Teams Say
Teams that stopped hoping and started proving.
We thought our failover worked. The first experiment proved it didn't, in staging, where it was cheap to fix.
Engineering Lead
SaaS platform
Our MTTR dropped by nearly half once the on-call team had actually practiced the scenarios.
SRE Manager
E-commerce
Chaos days turned anxiety into confidence. We now ship faster because we trust our recovery paths.
CTO
Tech scale-up
Frequently Asked Questions
What engineering teams ask before adopting chaos engineering.

Case Study
Northwave Cloud logo
Cloud / SaaS
Dossier KOR-2024-C002

The Challenge

Northwave's SaaS platform had grown fast and passed every functional test, but nobody knew how it behaved under real failure. Load testing showed healthy averages, yet the team had a nagging suspicion that the green dashboards were hiding fragile dependencies.

Our Solution

Korur designed a series of controlled chaos experiments against a production-like environment: killing instances, injecting network latency, throttling the database connection pool and severing third-party dependencies one at a time. Each experiment had a clear hypothesis and a defined blast radius so nothing ran uncontrolled.

12
Failure modes identified
12 of 12
Fixed before production
0
Launch-day incidents
3x
Sustained traffic increase absorbed

Know Your Failures Before Production Does

Every system breaks somewhere. We'll find your breaking points safely, in controlled chaos. Your team learns. Your confidence skyrockets. Your customers never see downtime.